News | DrumhellerMail - Page #2954
11012024Fri
Last updateTue, 29 Oct 2024 3pm

Council weighs water boundary change

    Rocky View County is awaiting a decision from Drumheller Town Council as to whether it will be able to utilize water beyond prescribed boundaries drawn up in an agreement with the Kneehill Regional Water Services Commission, now Aqua 7 Regional Water Commission.
    Rocky View is a member of the commission and has an allocation of 2,200 cubic metres per day. Under the most recent agreement dating back to 2008, the agreement allows water services to the corporate boundaries of the Hamlet of Kathryn.
    The County would like to extend those boundaries.
    “It was a restrictive map,” said Rocky View County Reeve Rolly Ashdown in the Rocky View Weekly. “It turned out the map was more restrictive… than it was meant to be. (We are) trying to clarify and establish good future supplies of water.”
    The Mail erroneously reported in its November 23 edition there would be a further allocation of 5,020 cubic metres per day to Rocky View. This is not the case according to Mayor Terry Yemen, who was on council in 2007 when the town was asked to relax the borders in order to bring water to the Balzac development. In fact, this is the biggest difference between the two proposals.
    “They are completely different, they are not even apples and oranges,” said Yemen. “We are already under contract to Rocky View for 2,200 cubic metres per day… all they are saying is ‘ let us plan for the future and let us use it anywhere in the MD.’”
    “They're not asking for any more than they are allotted for.”
    “It (2007 negotiations) was completely different. They were asking for 7,500 cubic metres per day and no ceiling on it. With that and all the other allocations, we would have to put money into the plant to update it and they weren’t there with enough money.”
    Councillor Sharel Shoff was also on council during those negations for the Balzac development. She said council is pondering the change. She said the concern is whether the change would be worthwhile to the Town of Drumheller.
    “What we are trying to find out is what would be the liability on the town,” said Shoff.
    She said while the town would gain on the revenue side, council wants to make sure the additional costs associated such as liability and plant costs for producing more water would be in line.
    “If our insurance is going to go up a lot, and we are not going to bring in that much more, why would we do it?” said Shoff.
    Yemen said when he was initially approached by Rocky View, it appeared to be an urgent concern, however it now appears the water would not be needed for a least five years and is  part of a long term plan.
    “I wish they would use their allotment. If they used it, it would be about a 10 per cent reduction in our utility costs,” said Yemen.


Institution expansion underway

    The Drumheller Institution is one step closer to its expansion, and construction has already begun.
    In August of 2010, the expansion, which would see 96 beds added to the Medium Security Unit and 50 beds to the Minimum Security Unit, was announced.   The project budgeted $15 million for the Medium Security Unit expansion and $110 million for the Minimum Security Unit expansion.
    Since then Dowland Contracting, headquartered in Innuvik was awarded the contract on October 4 of this year. The construction is valued at $10,826,723, before GST.
    Work is currently underway.
    The expansion, when announced, was said to increase the capacity of the Institution in response to the federal governments’ Truth in Sentencing Act.  Prior to the act, a person who is being held in presentence custody would receive two-for-one credit for their time served.  With the Truth In Sentencing Act a person would receive credit at a ratio of one-to-one, except when circumstances justify up at a 1.5-to-one ratio.
    The federal government is currently work to passing its Safe Street and Communities act, which includes toughening up penalties for a number of crimes.
At the time of the initial announcement, then Warden Mike Hanly expected the expansion could create about 30 full time positions.
    While the 96 bed Medium Security Unit expansion is underway, Melissa Hart, senior media relations officer for Correctional Services Canada says a competitive process is underway for the 50 unit Minimum Security annex and construction is expected to be underway in the spring.
The project is anticipated to be complete in 2013-2014.

Opponents to Midland Park drilling seek resolution

    A surface consultant for Evolve Surface Strategies confirms Bearspaw Petroleum’s willingness to participate in an Appropriate Disputes Resolution (ADR) process with landowners who object to a development across the river from Nacmine, with an Energy Resources Conservation Board (ERCB) facilitator present.
    This was confirmed in a letter to a Nacmine resident who has objected to Bearspaw Petroleum’s plan to drill three directional wells from an existing surface lease in Midland Provincial Park near McMullen Island and the walking trail.
    At this point, Bearspaw has not made an application to the ERCB for the project.
    Evolve delivered notifications to residents of Nacmine, who are across the river from the proposed drilling in July of this year informing them of the proposed project. In September, a surface consultant sat down with four Nacmine residents to hear their concerns.
    In a letter dated November 14 to an objecting resident, on behalf of Bearspaw, Evolve provided a formal response to some  of the concerns. It also expressed  an openness to sit down with a facilitator from the ERCB.
    “This will give you, Evolve and Bearspaw, the opportunity to discuss any further questions or concerns you may have in a safe and structured environment with an ERCB representative to facilitate communication flow,” states the letter.
    In regards to the walking trails, while they will be closed during the construction in the interest of public safety, the letter states that Bearspaw acknowledges the significance of the walking trails and understands the importance of reopening the trail as soon as possible.
    It also provoked a portion of the ERCB’s directive 038 on noise control to explain acceptable noise levels, another concern of residents.
    The response also said the project is licensed for sweet gas, and that there will be no H2S, or sour gas encountered at any time during the drilling or completions.
    One concern expressed was the drilling could be underneath historic mineshafts in the area. According to the letter, Bearspaw is currently investigating the Atlas Coal Mine and the whereabouts of mineshaft schematics.
    The drilling, if it goes ahead, is said to last 10-14 days per well, and drilling will continue 24 hours a day, seven days a week. Completion activities are expected to last one week per completed zone per well and will be restricted to 7 a.m. to 7 p.m. The letter states there will be no permanent flare stacks required for the site and flaring will be restricted to 4 hours per day. It is only required when the service rig is on site.
    The letter says Ghostpine Environmental Services has been engaged to conduct a pre-site assessment for the project. Included in the assessment reports is documentation of known species in the area, their sensitivities and recommendations on how to mitigate the impact on noted species.
    Ghostpine also recommends mandatory spill contained and erosion control measures during and after construction because the site is in close proximity to the river and on the floodplain.
    Bearspaw also acknowledges that Bearspaw is responsible for remediation and reclamation of its sites, and would be required to reclaim the location once the facility is no longer in production. In the event of a spill or a contamination occurrence, Bearspaw is required to report the spill to the ERCB, advise residents and undertake immediate action to remediate.
    An Appropriate Dispute Resolution process can take a number of forums, according to the ERCB including direct negotiation, ECB staff facilitation, third party mediation, arbitration or an ERCB public hearing in hopes of coming to an agreeable solution. These may be used in all types of projects.
    Staff facilitation can take place before a company files an application. The facilitator is there to allow parties to communicate openly and respectfully. They can provide technical information and explain the ERCB’s processes. The facilitator is not there to rule on matters.
    If this process is successful in satisfying the concerns of residents, the company can file its application without pending objections.


Subcategories

The Drumheller Mail encourages commenting on our stories but due to our harassment policy we must remove any comments that are offensive, or don’t meet the guidelines of our commenting policy.