News | DrumhellerMail - Page #583
10022024Wed
Last updateMon, 30 Sep 2024 4pm

Survey says, Kneehill County residents overall happy

Copy of Copy of Copy of Copy of kneehill county new admin building

Between July and August, Kneehill County residents were given the opportunity to participate in the county’s first citizen satisfaction survey.
Approximately 10 per cent of residents, some 220 respondents, answered the survey regarding their satisfaction with services, overall quality of life, and council priorities; the results of the survey were shared with council during the regular Tuesday, September 28 council meeting.
“We worked with Christine and her team to send every resident that had a mailing address a survey with a unique link that was only tied to that particular address, so no one could complete the survey multiple times,” said Leger Vice President Eddie Sheppard during the presentation.
This is only one of a few surveys which have been conducted by Leger during the course of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Overall, some 80 per cent of residents noted they have a positive quality of life, while six per cent noted their quality of life in Kneehill County is poor. These results are consistent among other municipalities, even pre-pandemic, according to Mr. Sheppard.
73 per cent of respondents said in the last three years their quality of life in Kneehill County has remained the same; six per cent said it had improved, and 21 per cent said it had worsened.
Those who said their quality of life decreased, 26 per cent said it was due to poor county council and lack of accountability.
However, Mr. Sheppard noted this was a very small sample size, approximately 46 respondents, and was not the majority. While Mr. Sheppard said these numbers are not alarming, he noted it is something to pay attention to.
62 per cent of respondents said Kneehill County is a great place to raise a family, 61 per cent would recommend Kneehill County as a place to live, and 59 per cent are proud to live in the county.
There were some areas of improvement which Mr. Sheppard pointed out to council.
Only 34 per cent of respondents felt the county is planning for the future, and Mr. Sheppard noted this could be a big area for improvement; he also noted creating a sense of community and belonging was another area the county could improve, though this is an area municipalities are struggling with across the board due to the impacts COVID-19 restrictions are having on community events.
“We have seen these scores drop across all our research,” Mr. Sheppard said. “And that’s largely due to the fact there’s been a lack of ability to do so.”
Overall, 57 per cent of respondents said they were satisfied with the services and programs offered by Kneehill County.
Fire and emergency services were the services residents were most satisfied with at 84 per cent; cemeteries and wastewater collection, recycling and transfer stations were also among the top three at 78 and 75 per cent respectively.
However, residents were not satisfied with public engagement, business supports, or land use, planning and development services, with each only receiving satisfaction rates of 46, 45, and 44 per cent respectively.
There were several issues respondents noted the county is currently facing; 14 per cent said the most important local issue is improvements in

council and more transparency. Roads, bridge infrastructure, and gravel road grading came in as the second most important issue at 13 per cent, while local economy and business growth, and fiscal responsibility both came in with 10 per cent.
Respondents reported they were overall very satisfied with Kneehill County staff; 75 per cent felt staff were courteous and helpful, while 70 per cent felt they were easy to get in contact with when necessary, and 69 per cent found them knowledgeable.
Despite favourable opinions on Kneehill County staff, the feeling was not mutual toward council.
Although 44 per cent of respondents said they felt the county were quick to respond to requests and concerns, only 34 per cent felt council practiced open and accessible governance.
These were areas Mr. Sheppard noted offered opportunities for improvement.
The input received from the survey will help council determine areas and opportunities for improvement, and will be used in the future to determine delivering services and strategic planning.


Glenn Koester running for seventh term on council

IMG 0001

Lifelong Wheatland County resident Glenn Koester is running for his seventh term on Wheatland County council for Division 6.
During his time on council, Koester has served on council since 2003 and has a wealth of experience among the different boards and committees in the county, and was a founding member of the Wheatland Regional Corporation (WRC) which helped make potable water a reality for the communities of Rockyford, Standard, Gleichen, Rosebud, and Redland. He has also served as both Reeve and Deputy Reeve of the council, between 2011 and 2018, and in 2019 respectively.
Koester currently serves on the Wheatland Housing Management Board (WHMB), which is in the process of securing provincial funding to build a new lodge and hospice in the Town of Strathmore which will also service Wheatland County residents.
“I consider this a necessity due to the current need, as well as the ever growing future demand,” Koester says in a press release. He adds, “I consider the work done on these boards to be an important part of council.”
Koester says he is experienced, with more than 18 years on council, honest, and committed. If elected, he will continue to listen and understand the wants and needs of ratepayers, ensure everyone has the chance to voice their concerns and be heard, and endeavour to be trustworthy and open minded. He adds he is committed to continuing to serve his division and make Wheatland County the greatest community in Alberta.
“I have a sincere will to serve Wheatland County and its residents to the best of my ability. I will be fair, however, I realize that I can’t make everyone happy all the time,” he says.

Wheatland County sends EMS capacity resolution to Central RMA District

Wheatland Logo 2021

Wheatland County sent a resolution to the Central District Rural Municipalities of Alberta (RMA) for endorsement regarding concerns about the capacity and delivery of ambulance services in rural Alberta.
The submission deadline was September 15, ahead of the regularly scheduled council meeting on Tuesday, September 21 and council ratified the submission at the meeting.
“We’re impacted by resources being drawn into Calgary, and there are other municipalities that are experiencing the same,” said Wheatland County Reeve Amber Link during the meeting.
Reeve Link added this has impacts and concerns for public safety.
In the September 15 edition of the Mail, it was noted the Health Sciences Association of Alberta (HSAA) began posting the status of ambulance service throughout the province, and the increased number of Red Alerts-where there are no ambulances available.
Councillor Glenn Koester originally requested Wheatland County to forward the resolution to the Central RMA general meeting regarding the concerns rural Albertans face with the provincial EMS service.
With EMS services transitioning from a municipal to provincial responsibility, many rural Albertans have been left without ambulatory services, or reduced capacity, due to the repositioning of resources to other areas-mostly to more populated, urban and metropolitan areas, such as Calgary.
“Since the transition to a provincial EMS system, the impacts on municipalities, who support emergency medical care by providing medical first response, includes increasing need for municipal fire services to provide medical first response, which can result in increased stress on firefighters responding to medical incidents and increased costs,” states the resolution.
The resolution was sent for endorsement at the Central RMA district general meeting, which was ratified unanimously by council; if it receives endorsement it will move forward to the RMA conference, scheduled for November.


Subcategories

The Drumheller Mail encourages commenting on our stories but due to our harassment policy we must remove any comments that are offensive, or don’t meet the guidelines of our commenting policy.