News | DrumhellerMail - Page #77
12262024Thu
Last updateTue, 24 Dec 2024 1pm

Stop Order upheld in Carbon

IMG 2678

A decision has been made in regards to an appeal made by a landowner in Carbon who moved a house onto his property without the proper permit.

On Wednesday, February 20, the Village of Carbon’s acting CAO and Development Officer Tera Little issued a Stop Order to Crispen Sibanda, whose land is registered to Chris Maison Renovations, because he had a house moved onto his property without a Development Permit.

He went before The Regional Subdivision and Development Appeal Board on Thursday, March 21, in hopes of having the order lifted.

Sibanda was unsuccessful and the decision to uphold the Order was based upon the Land Use Bylaw it goes against, as well as the strict guidelines set by the Municipal Government Act.

The Lands known as Plan 1011734, Block 15, Lot 1, is zoned for R-1, meaning “Single Dwelling Residential District” according to Land Use Bylaw 2018-804. The home in question is classified as “Dwelling-Moved On” meaning that, according to the Bylaw, it is “a single detached dwelling that has previously been lived in used as a residence or other purpose in a previous location and is proposed to be relocated to a new parcel for use as a dwelling.”

The order was found to be properly issued because Section 27(3) of the Land Use Bylaw states, “Dwelling - Moved On is a discretionary use for the R-1 Single Detached Residential District” and Section 9(1) of the Land Use Bylaw states, “No development shall be undertaken unless an application has been approved and a development permit has been issued.”

Sibanda has 30 days from the date the decision was issued to make another appeal.


Council approves changes regarding Flag, Banner, Decorative Trail policy

IMG 1811

mailphoto by Patrick Kolafa

At the Monday, April 8, Regular Council Meeting, Drumheller Chief Administrative Officer (CAO) Darryl Drohomerski presented council with a Request for Decision to approve changes to the Flag, Pole Banner and Decorative Trail Policy INF-C-01.

In the beginning of March, issues arose regarding the current Pride Crosswalk located by Town Hall. There were concerns the Town wanted to remove the crosswalk, leading to backlash against the town on social media and the news for not being inclusive.

At the following Monday, March 11 Committee of the Whole Meeting, Mayor Heather Colberg expressed to the town council had no intention to immediately ban the crosswalk.

She asked the Administration to review the Bylaw to gather information because the cost of maintaining, and constantly repainting, the crosswalk was the main concern for council.

The new Policy INF-C-01, removes “Decorative Crosswalk” and brings forth the new “Decorative Trail” portion.

There is a proposed section of a walking trail where 20 metre strips of asphalt will be made available for designs to be painted on. The surface of the asphalt will allow for better wear of the paint overtime, unlike the current crosswalk.

Drumheller won’t be the first municipality to stop painting on high-traffic volume areas.

“Crosswalks tend to get a lot of use and abuse. Most municipalities are not using them anymore,” explains CAO Drohomerski. “We have identified an area in Midland, near the hospital, where there is very good asphalt. When paint is applied to it, it will last for a year at a time.”

There were many town officials involved in creating the new policy, with a lot of input from the community. However, there is still a process to apply for decorative trails to be approved.

“One thing that I mention when we are doing Policies and Bylaws is that they are not written in stone,” says Councillor Tom Zariski during the discussion part of the meeting. “I think this is a very good policy but as with every Policy and Bylaw, we will be looking at it to see what works and what doesn’t, and then we can review it again.”

“I hope this reaffirms Council’s support for diversity and the strength of our community,” adds Councillor Patrick Kolafa, who is in agreement with the rest of council that the proposed Decorative Trail has the potential to be a great attraction for residents and visitors. “Thank you to the community who provided input. It is important we have these voices heard.”

Requests for a 20 metre portion of the trail will be made through CAO Drohomerski when the policy is in place. The Town already has plans to include the dino logo in a border type fashion along the strips.

Land redesignation underway for new landfill in Kneehill

Document

photo submitted 

A Class II landfill, which will handle non-hazardous solid waste materials, is being proposed on over 500 acres of land in Kneehill County. Kneehill County council will hold a public hearing on Tuesday, April 23 regarding this proposal.

 

Waste Connection of Canada is proposing to construct a Class II Integrated Waste Management Facility (IWMF) in Kneehill County. A Class II landfill handles solid waste that is considered non-hazardous in accordance with provincial laws, and specializes in the collecting, transporting, processing and disposing of various types of residential, commercial, agricultural and industrial waste.

At the Tuesday, March 26, 2024, Council Meeting, a Request for Decision was presented to council members by Kneehill’s Manager of Planning and Development Barb Hazelton, to move first reading for Land Use Bylaw 1895 and 1896, amending Bylaw 1808 to Direct Control (DC) land district.

In order to apply for the Redesignation of Lands, the Municipal Government Act requires a public hearing to take place prior to council adopting the new Bylaw. Redesignations of land use are solely about the proposed use for the land, and not a permit to develop.

The IWMF site is proposed to be located Section 2-029-24-W4M, north of Township Road 29-0 and east of Range Road 24-2, on 536.86 acres of land. This said land is mostly designated as Agricultural District, with a portion designated as Local Rural Commercial District. The Redesignation of Land will classify the lands as DC districts.

“We recognize this as the beginning of a fairly lengthy process as far as redesignation is concerned. Even if it’s redesignated, after that it goes into a lot more complicated process,” states Ken King, Reeve of Kneehill County at the meeting.

There is a provincial approval process where acts and regulations must be met for any landfills going through this process. These require specific construction standards, details of the operation and closure of the site, and are required to have a plan for annual groundwater monitoring.

There are many concerns among the residents who will be greatly impacted by the project. Lyle Miller lives next to the proposed site, where he owns and operates a farm with his family. He was informed on Good Friday, through a third party, of the proposed landfill being constructed a half mile to the north of him. It was on Thursday, April 4, that he received a letter from the County confirming it, and that a Public Hearing is scheduled for Tuesday, April 23.

“We’re probably the closest residence to this and there’s been no contact from the County and/or from the landfill company to us personally other than the letter we received in the mail,” states Miller.

Miller, and a handful of his neighbours, have taken it upon themselves to inform others within a five square mile radius of the site about what they can do. “We are informing people on who they should contact and what the process is,” Miller tells the Mail. “They can talk to councillors, talk to the MLA, write letters to the County prior to (April 18) and attend the meeting on (April 23).”

“As far as my opposition on the matter, our land values would be affected negatively. Dealing with the noise, smell, and air quality, it will be damaging to our quality of life,” says Miller about the many concerns from his perspective of living next to the landfill. “Garbage will collect in and around properties. There is the potential for groundwater contamination and predators to our livestock in the area. We are concerned about an increase in coyote and skunk populations, and there is a potential increase for gulls. There is quite a bit happening regarding the Avian Flu in the U.S. right now and it is being transferred over to livestock. It is a probability that it can happen here. Not to mention the impact the increase in gulls will have on our grain bags. They tear holes in them and cause spoilage because moisture gets into them. It will affect the quality of grain and limit how long we can store the bags. It’s a problem with being in agriculture and doing something different.”

The Public Hearing is scheduled for Tuesday, April 23, at 10:00 am at the Kneehill County Office in Three Hills.


Subcategories

The Drumheller Mail encourages commenting on our stories but due to our harassment policy we must remove any comments that are offensive, or don’t meet the guidelines of our commenting policy.